|
WHO
IS THE GREATEST ECONOMIST
OF THE 20TH CENTURY?
"But
half a century later, it is Keynes who has been toppled and
(_________________), the fierce advocate of free markets,
who is preeminent." --Daniel Yergin and Joseph Stanislaw,
The Commanding Heights, p. 15.
Who
deserves to be the greatest economist of the 20th century?
This question was debated at my session of the annual American
Economic Association meetings in New York City last month.
We polled the audience of about 150 economists, and John Maynard
Keynes won. Keynes revolutionized the economics profession
by contending that the free-market economy is inherently unstable
and requires government intervention (through deficit spending,
progressive taxation and monetary inflation) to keep it on
the path of full employment.
Of
course, the audience may have been biased since the topic
of the session was on Keynes's most famous proponent, Paul
A. Samuelson. Still, Keynesian economics--the economics of
government interventionism at the macro level--is very much
alive, and therefore, Keynes must be regarded as the most
influential economist of the 20th century.
FRIEDMAN'S
COUNTERREVOLUTION
However,
influence is not the same as greatness. Milton Friedman came
in second in the informal poll and in terms of greatness,
he exceeds Keynes. Time magazine's editor-in-chief, Norman
Pearlstine, gives the nod to Friedman as the "economist of
the century" (Time, December 7, 1998). And in a recent study
of living economists most frequently cited in college textbooks,
Milton Friedman came in #1 by a landslide. He was cited in
all the textbooks. (Paul Samuelson came in a distant #12.)
Friedman's contributions are many: He demonstrated that government,
not free enterprise, caused the Great Depression (through
a disastrous monetary policy); he showed that monetary policy
was more powerful than fiscal policy; he made the case against
progressive taxation, deficit spending and monetary inflation.
He won the Nobel Prize in 1976 for these efforts. His best
books are Capitalism and Freedom and Free to Choose (both
still in print, available through Laissez Faire Books, 800/326-0996).
Sharing
the Prize
Milton
Friedman should also share the prize of greatest economist
with Friedrich A. Hayek, the Austrian who studied under Ludwig
von Mises. As Yergin notes in The Commanding Heights (quoted
above), Hayek made a convincing case against socialist central
planning in The Road to Serfdom and other anti-socialist works.
He developed a powerful tool for explaining business cycles,
known as Austrian capital theory. His theory of knowledge
and entrepreneurship is vital in today's global economy. He
rightly won the Nobel Prize in 1974.
So
my vote goes to both Friedman and Hayek.
WHO
DO YOU CONSIDER THE GREATEST INVESTOR?
As
we approach the end of the 20th century, scholars are compiling
lists of the greatest writers, politicians, entrepreneurs
and scientists of this remarkable century.
I
know who gets my vote for greatest investor: Warren Buffett.
Not only has he consistently beaten the market, but his optimism
about America has paid off handsomely. Too bad he doesn't
own any Internet stocks. He could have been the world's first
trillionaire!
R.I.P.,
THE SUPERBOWL INDICATOR
I
bid a fond farewell to the Superbowl Indicator. Every so often,
market players get caught up in an irrational indicator that
allegedly makes it easy to predict the markets. In the 1970s
it was the soybean-silver ratio. In the 1980s it was the Kondratieff
Cycle. And in the 1990s it was the Superbowl Indicator. Supposedly,
if the National Football Conference (NFC) won the Superbowl,
stocks would rise; if the American Football Conference (AFC)
won, stocks would fall. Amazingly, this indicator worked for
decades. Throughout the 1990s, the NFC team won and the stock
market rose. Then last year the Denver Broncos of the AFC
won, and many stock market pundits exited the market or sold
short. Big mistake--the S&P 500 rose 28% in 1998! And
thus ended once and for all the Superbowl Indicator. Good
riddance, and may it be replaced by sound strategies based
on free-market economics!
|